![Game #90 - Defending against the Larsen-Nimzowitsch attack](https://betterchess.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Chess-game-analysis-masthead-1024x163.jpg)
The clock ticked down mercilessly on this 5-minute blitz recreation in opposition to my pal Leo right here in Bellevue, Washington. Black (yours really) needed to cope with the Larsen-Nimzowitsch assault, one thing my opponent performed within the hopes to steer the sport into uncharted territory.
The early strikes have been pretty normal, with each side creating their items. Nevertheless, on transfer eight, I opted for the robotic transfer – castling. Whereas protected, it wasn’t as efficient as solidifying the middle with strikes like d4 or b6. This turned a recurring theme all through the sport: a slight misstep on tempo that left me barely behind the curve.
I stumbled barely on transfer 9. As a substitute of exploiting the chance for 9…Nxe4!, I performed b6, which, whereas defending the c5 pawn and prepping Bb7, finally proved too gradual. Taking management of the middle with e5 would have been a way more efficient technique.
The choice to fianchetto the bishop on b7 with 10…Bb7 appeared cheap on the time. Nevertheless, a deeper look revealed a flaw: Leo’s instant e5 would have pushed again my knight and opened the door for the longer term cramping moved, d4. This, in flip, would have locked my bishop behind the sunshine squares, highlighting the significance of calculating variations earlier than committing to a seemingly innocuous transfer.
Regardless of these early missteps, I managed to keep up a slight benefit for a great portion of the sport. That is the place one other essential lesson emerged: avoiding pointless trades. Capturing his pawn with 11…Nxd5, whereas seemingly logical, allowed for the commerce of the dark-squared bishops, taking some strain off of Leo’s place. In hindsight, a extra aggressive method corresponding to capturing with the queen to keep away from trades may need been extra fruitful.
The turning level arrived with Leo’s fifteenth transfer, Ncd2. Whereas seemingly innocent, it created a weak sq. on c3. Seizing this chance, I performed Nc3, successfully trapping his queen. This crucial blunder serves as a stark reminder: at all times be looking out for weak squares your opponent would possibly supply. Exploiting them can result in a decisive benefit, because it did on this recreation.
This blitz battle in opposition to Leo was a whirlwind of missed alternatives and a harsh lesson (for him) within the significance of exact calculation and aggressive play. Whereas the ultimate consequence was a win, the expertise supplied worthwhile insights that can serve me effectively in future video games. The subsequent time I face the same scenario, I’ll try to solidify the middle early, calculate variations deeply, and keep away from pointless trades. And, after all, I’ll be further vigilant in recognizing these weak squares – they could simply maintain the important thing to victory.